@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ Browse through the NESH guidelines, available in both Norwegian: https://www.for
*Essential readings:*
- Wynne, Brian. 2006. Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? Public Health Genomics 9 (3): 211–20.
- Wynne, Brian. 2006. Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? Public Health Genomics 9 (3): 211–20. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/src/branch/main/Readings/Day%205+6:%20Critical%20perspectives/Readings/Wynne%20-%202006%20-%20Public%20Engagement%20as%20a%20Means%20of%20Restoring%20Public%20T.pdf))
- Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., Joakim Juhl, and Erik Aarden. “Challenging the ‘Deficit Model’ of Innovation: Framing Policy Issues under the Innovation Imperative.” Research Policy, New Frontiers in Science, Technology and Innovation Research from SPRU’s 50th Anniversary Conference, 48, no. 4 (May 1, 2019): 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.015.
- Berker, Thomas. “Negotiating research norms between academic and industrial research. The case of a research centre on zero emission buildings in Norway”, to be published in Nordic Architectural Research.
- Collins, Harry, Robert Evans, and Mike Gorman. “Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Case studies of expertise and experience, 38, no. 4 (December 2007): 657–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.003.
Thomas Berker
1 year ago