thomas
/
TOS
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases 5 Wiki Activity

move Rainer to 2nd day

Browse Source
main
Thomas Berker 6 months ago
parent 905c66deca
commit a107dd3195
1 changed files with 27 additions and 24 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File

51
README.md
Unescape Escape View File

@ -66,22 +66,24 @@ More info and readings coming soon
1215-1315 Lunch
1315-1500 Ståle Rainer Strøm Finke: The body as the locus of knowing
1315-1500 May Thorseth: Research ethics
This session deals with two enabling factors within science and their impact on our understanding of science: The body and literacy.
This session deals with three levels of research ethics:
- What role does the body play in the production of scientific knowledge?
- How does the customary association between literacy and academic knowledge influence how we theorize about science?
- What if things were different – what can we learn from knowledge systems that incorporate the knowing body in more articulate ways than we usually do in the Western academic tradition, without any involvement of literacy?
- Quality of research – good research conduct and the ethos of science
- Protecting persons and/or groups affected by research
- The social responsibility of research (broad research ethics)
*Readings:*
*Essential readings:*
- Bourdieu, P. (1992) Chapter 3: Structures, habitus, practices. In: The Logic of Practice (pp. 52-79). 1st edn. Stanford University Press. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Bourdieu.pdf))
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception and its philosophical consequences. In The primacy of perception (pp. 12-27). Northwestern University Press. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Primacy%20of%20perception_MP.pdf))
- Molander, B. (2015). Chapter 1: Knowledge and learning. Some examples. In: The practice of knowing and knowing in practices (pp. 13-33). Peter Lang Edition. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Molander1.pdf))
- Molander, B. (2015). Chapter 2: Tacit Knowledge and Silenced Knowledge. The Body, Culture, Action—and Language. In The practice of knowing and knowing in practices (pp. 35-70). Peter Lang Edition. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Practice%20of%20knowing_Ch.%202.pdf))
- Molander, B. (2015). Chapter 9: Two sides of the same coin. Professional knowledge and the culture of knowledge. In: The practice of knowing and knowing in practices (pp. 237-262). Peter Lang Edition. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Molander9.pdf))
- Young, I.M. (1980) ‘Throwing like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality’, Human Studies, 3(2), pp. 137–156. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Young1980.pdf))
- Kaiser, M (2014) The integrity of science. Lost in translation? Best practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 28(2):339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.003.
- Ruyter, K.W. (2019) The history of research ethics. Available at : https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/resources/the-research-ethics-library/systhematic-and-historical-perspectives/the-history-of-research-ethics/.
- Guillemin, M & Guillam, L (2004) Ethics, reflexivity and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry. 10(2):261-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
- Sarewitz, D (2016) The pressure to publish pushes down quality. Nature. 533:147 https://www.nature.com/articles/533147a.
*Additional reading:*
Browse through the NESH guidelines, available in both Norwegian: https://www.forskningsetikk.no/retningslinjer/hum-sam/forskningsetiske-retningslinjer-for-samfunnsvitenskap-og-humaniora/ or English: https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/guidelines/social-sciences-humanities-law-and-theology/guidelines-for-research-ethics-in-the-social-sciences-humanities-law-and-theology/
### 29. October: Philosophy and Research Ethics II (day 2)
@ -106,24 +108,25 @@ More info and readings coming soon
1200-1300: Lunch
1300-1500: May Thorseth: Research ethics
1300-1500: Ståle Rainer Strøm Finke: The body as the locus of knowing
This session deals with three levels of research ethics:
This session deals with two enabling factors within science and their impact on our understanding of science: The body and literacy.
- Quality of research – good research conduct and the ethos of science
- Protecting persons and/or groups affected by research
- The social responsibility of research (broad research ethics)
- What role does the body play in the production of scientific knowledge?
- How does the customary association between literacy and academic knowledge influence how we theorize about science?
- What if things were different – what can we learn from knowledge systems that incorporate the knowing body in more articulate ways than we usually do in the Western academic tradition, without any involvement of literacy?
*Essential readings:*
*Readings:*
- Bourdieu, P. (1992) Chapter 3: Structures, habitus, practices. In: The Logic of Practice (pp. 52-79). 1st edn. Stanford University Press. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Bourdieu.pdf))
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception and its philosophical consequences. In The primacy of perception (pp. 12-27). Northwestern University Press. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Primacy%20of%20perception_MP.pdf))
- Molander, B. (2015). Chapter 1: Knowledge and learning. Some examples. In: The practice of knowing and knowing in practices (pp. 13-33). Peter Lang Edition. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Molander1.pdf))
- Molander, B. (2015). Chapter 2: Tacit Knowledge and Silenced Knowledge. The Body, Culture, Action—and Language. In The practice of knowing and knowing in practices (pp. 35-70). Peter Lang Edition. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Practice%20of%20knowing_Ch.%202.pdf))
- Molander, B. (2015). Chapter 9: Two sides of the same coin. Professional knowledge and the culture of knowledge. In: The practice of knowing and knowing in practices (pp. 237-262). Peter Lang Edition. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Molander9.pdf))
- Young, I.M. (1980) ‘Throwing like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality’, Human Studies, 3(2), pp. 137–156. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/raw/branch/main/Readings/Day%201+2:%20Philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20research%20ethics/Readings/Young1980.pdf))
- Kaiser, M (2014) The integrity of science. Lost in translation? Best practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 28(2):339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.003.
- Ruyter, K.W. (2019) The history of research ethics. Available at : https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/resources/the-research-ethics-library/systhematic-and-historical-perspectives/the-history-of-research-ethics/.
- Guillemin, M & Guillam, L (2004) Ethics, reflexivity and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry. 10(2):261-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
- Sarewitz, D (2016) The pressure to publish pushes down quality. Nature. 533:147 https://www.nature.com/articles/533147a.
*Additional reading:*
Browse through the NESH guidelines, available in both Norwegian: https://www.forskningsetikk.no/retningslinjer/hum-sam/forskningsetiske-retningslinjer-for-samfunnsvitenskap-og-humaniora/ or English: https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/guidelines/social-sciences-humanities-law-and-theology/guidelines-for-research-ethics-in-the-social-sciences-humanities-law-and-theology/
### 11. November: Science in context I (day 3)

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save