@ -7,20 +7,21 @@ All files including the readings are published as releases (see the releases-but
<!-- markdown-toc start - Don't edit this section. Run M-x markdown-toc-refresh-toc -->
**Table of Contents**
- [About the course](#about-the-course)
- [Formalities](#formalities)
- [Lecturers ](#lecturers)
- [Rooms (all in Dragvoll)](#rooms-all-in-dragvoll)
- [Credit points](#credit-points)
- [Required readings ](#required-readings)
- [Course program](#course-program)
- [07. February: Philosophy and Research Ethics I (day 1)](#07-february-philosophy-and-research-ethics-i--day-1)
- [08. February: Philosophy and Research Ethics II (day 2)](#08-february-philosophy-and-research-ethics-ii-day-2)
- [20 March: Science in context I (day 3)](#20-march-science-in-context-i-day-3)
- [21 March: Science in context II (day4)](#21-march-science-in-context-ii-day4)
- [16. April: Critical perspectives I (day 5)](#16-april-critical-perspectives-i--day-5)
- [17 April: Critical perspectives II (day 6)](#17-april-critical-perspectives-ii--day-6)
- [22. May: Conference](#22-may-conference)
- [Theories of Science - Spring 2024 - All you need to know](#theories-of-science---spring-2024---all-you-need-to-know)
- [About the course](#about-the-course)
- [Formalities](#formalities)
- [Lecturers ](#lecturers)
- [Rooms (all in Dragvoll)](#rooms-all-in-dragvoll)
- [Credit points](#credit-points)
- [Required readings ](#required-readings)
- [Course program](#course-program)
- [07. February: Philosophy and Research Ethics I (day 1)](#07-february-philosophy-and-research-ethics-i--day-1)
- [08. February: Philosophy and Research Ethics II (day 2)](#08-february-philosophy-and-research-ethics-ii-day-2)
- [20 March: Science in context I (day 3)](#20-march-science-in-context-i-day-3)
- [21 March: Science in context II (day4)](#21-march-science-in-context-ii-day4)
- [16. April: Critical perspectives I (day 5)](#16-april-critical-perspectives-i--day-5)
- [17 April: Critical perspectives II (day 6)](#17-april-critical-perspectives-ii--day-6)
- [22. May: Conference](#22-may-conference)
<!-- markdown-toc end -->
@ -202,7 +203,11 @@ Browse through the NESH guidelines, available in both Norwegian: https://www.for
- Haraway, Donna 1988. ”Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective” Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575-599 (24 s) ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/src/branch/main/Readings/Day%205+6:%20Critical%20perspectives/Readings/Haraway-SituatedKnowledgesScience-1988.pdf))
- Harding, Sandra, 2001 “Feminist Standpoint Epistemology” in Lederman, M. & Bartsch, i The Gender and Science Reader, London: Routledge: 145-165 ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/src/branch/main/Readings/Day%205+6:%20Critical%20perspectives/Readings/Harding%202001.pdf))
1100-1200 and 1200-1300 Elisabeth Stubberud: Decolonizing knowledge production and objectivity
1100-1200 Thomas Berker: Introduction to the "ledger of grievances"
1200-1300 Lunch
1300-1500 Elisabeth Stubberud: Decolonizing knowledge production and objectivity
*Essential readings:*
@ -215,15 +220,15 @@ Browse through the NESH guidelines, available in both Norwegian: https://www.for
- Dankertsen, Astrid (2022) ' Avkolonisering av akademia fra et samisk perspektiv' ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/src/branch/main/Readings/Day%205+6:%20Critical%20perspectives/Readings/Dankertsen%20under%20publisering%20-%20Avkolonisering%20av%20akademia%20fra%20et%20samisk%20perspektiv.pdf))
1300-1500 Astrid Rasch
### 17 April: Critical perspectives II (day 6)
0900-1100 Astrid Rasch
0915-1500 Thomas Berker: The many uses of science: engagement, interdisciplinarity, innovation and sustainability
1115-1500 Thomas Berker: The many uses of science: engagement, interdisciplinarity, innovation and sustainability
*Essential readings:*
- Wynne, Brian. 2006. Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? Public Health Genomics 9 (3): 211–20. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/src/branch/main/Readings/Day%205+6:%20Critical%20perspectives/Readings/Wynne%20-%202006%20-%20Public%20Engagement%20as%20a%20Means%20of%20Restoring%20Public%20T.pdf))
- Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., Joakim Juhl, and Erik Aarden. “Challenging the ‘Deficit Model’ of Innovation: Framing Policy Issues under the Innovation Imperative.” Research Policy, New Frontiers in Science, Technology and Innovation Research from SPRU’s 50th Anniversary Conference, 48, no. 4 (May 1, 2019): 895–904. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/src/branch/main/Readings/Day%205+6:%20Critical%20perspectives/Readings/Pfotenhauer%20et%20al.%20-%202019%20-%20Challenging%20the%20%E2%80%9Cdeficit%20model%E2%80%9D%20of%20innovation%20Fra.pdf))
- Berker, Thomas. “Negotiating research norms between academic and industrial research. The case of a research centre on zero emission buildings in Norway”, to be published in Nordic Architectural Research. ([here](https://learn.kultwiki.net/thomas/TOS-H23/src/branch/main/Readings/Day%205+6:%20Critical%20perspectives/Readings/Berker_Negotiating_research_norms.pdf))
Thomas Berker
12 months ago